9/16 NJ Striped Bass Public Hearing 6-8PM

[1captainron]

Originally Posted by hammer4reel

Because there has never been a united front demanding change .
The marches in Washington had better turn out from states thousands of miles away than it did from Nj .
We didn’t even fill 2 buses at the slowest time of the year for fishing either year
Would have thought we could fill 10 buses just with people from the NJ for hire fleet.

I remember that well Dan, I sat on that bus and watched the competition shape up that day, I was beyond pissed. I stayed active many years not looking for thanks but for survival. The clowns of years past are still the clowns today with nothing to show for themselves. Seems nothing will ever change.

[bunker dunker]

so who are the clowns?? the peeps that go full bore,give it there all with no results or the peeps who just sit back and watch because they know what the outcome will be after watching for 40 years???.this whole thing su*&s for sure.

[Broad Bill]

Unfortunately I couldn't attend this evenings meeting in Manahawkin. Anyone on the site attend and if so I'd appreciate an update how it went. Thanks.

[hartattack]

Originally Posted by Broad Bill

Unfortunately I couldn't attend this evenings meeting in Manahawkin. Anyone on the site attend and if so I'd appreciate an update how it went. Thanks.

Hey Tom I couldn't attend either but here's an attached summary from Nick H:

[Broad Bill]

Larry.....thanks! Unimaginable that's where this fishery might be headed. Party, Charter boats and small businesses will be devastated and forget fall blitz fishing in NJ or Montauk for that matter. If the stock is in this much trouble, it's an indictment on just how bad the last decade or more of management of the stock has been yet were expected to believe that same management has found religion and a closure is the formula for the road to recovery. Wow!

[Smach7]

Summary of Meeting (In addition to Nick's comments)

80 to 100 people in attendance. Meeting started with Emile Franke of Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) providing a summary of Striped Bass Addendum III Amendment 7, including displaying of various tables and charts contained therein which ASMFC is using to show why the proposed actions under the addendum are necessary to meet their 2029 Striped Bass Stock Target. The meeting was then opened up to questions.
Many excellent questions very asked regarding these tables and charts.
The meeting was then opened up to comments. All of the comments presented were in favor of the New Jersey Marine Fisheries Commission position of Status Quo, except for one person who spoke in favor of the addendum.

Stephen Machalaba
Hi-Mar Striper Club

[Gerry Zagorski]

Here’s another summary

This is my take on the Striped Bass meeting last night in Stafford Township Volunteer Fire Hall. It was all about the reduction of harvest in our recreational community.

I arrived right at 6 pm last night, representing American Angler and our 275-member organization. I also manage and own a small local tackle shop in Ocean County, and noticed that there were just over 100 other participants in attendance for the meeting, which lasted just over two hours. The goal of this meeting was to get suggestions from the recreational angler on how to increase Striped Bass Biomass by reducing the Striped Bass recreational harvest by 12 percent. This could mean closed dates, no harvesting, or even worse, no targeting. It's a very complex issue with the Atlantic States Fishery Commission (Board). Details regarding these estimates, guesses, and assumptions are provided, but the following points stood out to me personally.

1) One Charter Captain asked the question, "Has the board taken into consideration the financial/economic impact of this reduction if these new rules are implemented"? He further said, "It would affect him personally by 36 percent, again if implemented". The answer to this question by the coordinator was "Yes, the board has always had this in mind when making decisions and suggestions on the Striped Bass. However, she admitted the last study on this was in 2015, and no new data has been provided. My 2 cents on this is, do not implement these rules until you have ALL of the data! Out-of-date data and no real-time information should be present when making any decisions related. Especially when the decisions impact anglers, retailers, and manufacturers heavily.

2) The chart shows a recent decrease in the biomass of the Striped Bass. Along with that, the board indicates there is still a 9 percent fatality rate on "Catch and Release". Even though back in 2020, the Circle Hook rule was added, and the end of the Snag and Drop rule. Either they have not considered this impact or done any studies on these new rules, which should change the 9 percent fatality rate substantially. And if not, why have it? Personally, I love the Circle Hook rule as I believe it works. I have seen many anglers give special care to make sure the Striped Bass return alive.

3) Multiple times it came up that they get their information on the current Striped Bass Biomass from data, studies, VTR's and phone calls. It was pointed out by NOAA that the results of the 2024 study of the Biomass population of Striped Bass can be off as much as "30 to 40 percent." That being said, in my 40 years of fishing for Striped Bass, I have only been asked once "what I caught" by an official of the state, and that was because it was from a friend whom I recognized when leaving the beach. So, where is this phone book of "registration" that we had to implement back over a decade ago? Natta!

4) The board reconizes that closures in New Jersey will not have the same effect in other states along our coast. However, because of the migration of the Striped Bass in the spring and fall, New Jersey may have one of the worst impacts of these closures. I do not think they are seriously taking all of this into consideration.There seems to be no way it would be fair along our coast if closures are accepted.

5) Most, if not all, of the commentators last night felt that New Jersey should keep the Status Quo for the regulations in 2026. That is from 28 inches to 30.99 inches. It seemed to be united on this suggestion.

So in my opinion, the data is flawed, and there is little to no real science to prove that the Biomass of Striped Bass needs to be increased by having more restrictions on the recreational angler. We at American Angler feel the Status Quo should be implemented in 2026, and let's also take into consideration that there are so many anglers out there that cannot or will not (a whole different subject) abide by the new and possibly difficult-to-understand and remember the new regulations. Again, Status Quo!

P.S. I have thought long and hard on how to improve the accuracy of the data of the Striped Bass population. I believe there is a possible solution that has proven in the past to help improve the accuracy of the Striped Bass. However, it would cost time, money, and more work for the recreational angler. And in my inner circles of related fishing friends, I brought this idea up and have been crucified by it, and therefore tabled the idea for now. But, in the meantime, we are facing a moratorium on the Striped Bass due to bad science. Which one of these is the lesser of two evils?