![]() |
|
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ||
|
|||||||
| NJFishing.com Salt Water Fishing Use this board to post all general salt water fishing information. Please use the appropriate boards below for all other information. General information about sailing times, charter availability and open boats trips can be found and should be posted in the open boat forum. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
DEC NY RELEASES 2024 STRIPED BASS YOUNG-OF-YEAR SURVEY RESULTS
Second Consecutive Year of Poor Juvenile Production in the Hudson River The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) today announced the 2024 Hudson River striped bass young-of-year survey results for 2024 depict a second consecutive year of poor juvenile production in the Hudson River. The index value, which provides an estimate of annual juvenile production for striped bass in the Hudson River, is generated through a beach seine survey at 13 sites in the lower Hudson River conducted bi-weekly from July to November. This is the 45th year of the survey, which provides important long-term monitoring information about striped bass and other fish species in the Hudson River. “DEC’s annual juvenile striped bass survey conducted in the Hudson River is a critical method for measuring the reproductive success and potential future abundance of the striped bass population along the Atlantic Coast,” said DEC Interim Commissioner Sean Mahar. “Given the challenges striped bass are experiencing in other spawning areas and the poor results of the 2023 survey, this year’s below average index value in the Hudson River heightens the concerns of the future availability of this critical resource as we approach the next decade.” The 2024 value for the DEC’s Hudson River striped bass young-of-year index was 7.85 fish per haul. This value is below the long-term average, and for the second consecutive year, survey values were below the 25th percentile. The survey can be viewed at: Striped Bass Juvenile production is an important part of rebuilding the coastal striped bass stock and is heavily dependent on environmental conditions in estuaries along the Atlantic Coast. The recent low values in the Hudson River add to concerns about striped bass production in other Atlantic coastal estuaries. The Maryland young-of-year index in the Chesapeake Bay also posted poor results in 2024, extending a string of poor annual reproduction events in the Chesapeake Bay to a sixth consecutive year. New York State works cooperatively with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) to manage striped bass. In response to projections from the 2024 Stock Assessment Update, the ASMFC Board will meet on Dec.16, to consider adjusting 2025 management measures to reduce fishing mortality and increase the probability of rebuilding the coastal stock of striped bass (meeting details).
__________________
Once in a while you can get shown the light In the strangest of places if you look at it right |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Larry that's going to be another nail in the fishery's coffin and another reason there will be a seasonal closure. When fisheries management promotes harvest of the large breeders in the stock for all these years and allows fishing during the spawn in the Hudson and Chesapeake, why should these results be a revelation. Their policy decisions caused it. Close fishing down during the spawn and give the stock a break as they get absolutely pounded year round. And for Christ sake, kick Cooke Inc. out of the Chesapeake and slash their quotas of menhaden in the ocean until the consequential impacts of their netting on other stocks and the environment are quantified and corrected. Stop being politicians and start solving problems. Stop using public resources as your personal piggy bank and start doing your job. If they didn't see both these problems coming with stripers and fluke a mile away, they're either completely incompetent or corrupt and most likely a combination of both. How many people ever worked for a company where one day your walked in and management said, "We have to cut staff by 50% because we thought we were making money but we're actually losing our shirts". These problems took years in the making and are of a scale large enough where the obvious question is why were less severe preventative measure not put on place sooner to avoid decisions which will bring with them catastrophic economic impacts and a potential moratorium on stock access for some period of time. Can you imagine NO FALL SURF FISHING next year for the two best months of the year and the impact that will have on tackle shops, small ocean community businesses and recreational anglers rights to enjoy a activity enjoyed for over a century. These regulatory agencies are destroying fisheries and people's lives and livelihoods with no recourse whatsoever. It's absolutely pathetic how this process works and the results being delivered.
When management has to revert to drastic measures it means they have no idea how to manage the stock. If they did, we wouldn't be at DEFCON 1 and we wouldn't be talking about such extreme measures as seasonal closures and in the case of fluke a 42% quota cut. That's their report card and they're failing miserably since they're management ideologies are completely flawed. Extreme levels of incompetency in both federal and state agencies with no accountability whatsoever to the general public. Last edited by Broad Bill; 12-12-2024 at 01:06 PM.. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
SUPPORTER / CONTRIBUTOR SSFFF RFA-NJ Member |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And you won't find one person involved with these agencies that says "We royally %$#&@! this up!" |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
As I said, the decision has already been made. ---------------->
Maybe if we got on buses and marched on Washington. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Again I respect your efforts on the FW side of fishing!
__________________
SUPPORTER / CONTRIBUTOR SSFFF RFA-NJ Member |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Same can be said for Chris Smith, Jeff Van Drew, Josh Gottheimer plus then Gov Christie and now Murphy All career politicians yet Crickets ![]()
__________________
SUPPORTER / CONTRIBUTOR SSFFF RFA-NJ Member |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Should people not send in comments or attend the meeting? I'm wasn't saying or implying that. After seven years trying and one door after another slammed in my face, even in certain cases by "recreational leadership", it's difficult staying positive. And with today's economic climate, fishery decisions prospectively will be made even more based on economic impact. The problem as I see it is the recreational communities impact on the economy isn't viewed equally or for the same reasons the commercial sector is. The federal government in my opinion believes recreational anglers will spend money and fish regardless of how much they catch or can retain, and to some degree they're correct. Commercial on the other hand needs "harvest" in order to create "catch value", their contribution to the economic benefits of the sector and that's where the problem starts. I think the government is completely underestimating the impact to the economy and social impacts if recreational fishing one day goes away or becomes a shadow of what it's been for decades. My frustration, like most, is I don't think anyone in Washington gives a shit and I don't think any one or handful of politicians will change the process or views of the bureaucrats in Washington. The Department of Commerce and NMFS won't change their ideologies or focus and certainly won't admit they've been and still are wrong with these regulations. That's why I have so much disdain for Michael Waine and ASA. We, meaning you, me and Dan along with a dozen or so others, presented them with issues they said they'd take to the Hill and as far as I know it was all BS and they didn't do a dam thing. Waine said to me leaving that meeting "you need to be more diplomatic in your approach" meaning be more respectful in my correspondence. Management incompetency and too much diplomacy is what got us here. As I said, when the commercial sector has a problem, they sue and usually win. Maybe that's because the Dept. of Commerce values them more, don't know. Recreational has a problem, we complain and say thank you sir may I have another. I know all we have is our voice but truly don't know what the answer is other than it's probably going to take a whole lot more radical approach than signing petitions and attending meetings. Doesn't mean we shouldn't utilize what's available, I've just lost hope those same approaches which haven't worked in past will for some reason cause change today. Economic impact statistics from NOAA: Sales impact: $321 billion Jobs supported: 2.3 million Commercial sales: $183 billion Recreational sales: $138 billion Source: NOAA Fisheries In my humble opinion, this is the primary reason why the recreational sector gets the short end of the stick religiously and why catch decisions tend to favor the commercial sector. That and the fact mentioned earlier which is Washington views our impact based on how many days we fish, not on how many fish we harvest since we don't sell our catch. As a matter of fact, the more we catch the less we'll buy retail so it's in their best interest to limit catch to our sector. Fair and Equitable allocation of resources as mandated by MSA, it's just a slogan and not how sectors are really being regulated. To Capt Ron's point, in my opinion NMFS wants recreational anglers on the water spending their hard earned money, what they don't want is the sector harvesting our proportionate share of the resource. It's a problem which will impact sector regulations and the overall health of stocks until management moves from the Department of Commerce back to the Department of the Interior where it belongs which with the amount of money involved will most likely never happen. Just my two cents. Last edited by Broad Bill; 12-13-2024 at 08:58 AM.. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
we need more "common sense and less dollar and sense".we need to flush the toilet and clear the offices of those who are making the marine decisions.i feel like the bird and glass door.should we have to have this conversation every season????should we have to have this conversation about every fish???i may be a bit older but man this has been going on forever.this is like a bad movie that the they keep making sequels for.i hate to say this but with this constant parade
of bs,golf is looking better and better. |
![]() |
|
|