RFA Update on Sanctuary Proposal

[dales529]

It appears statements are now answers to questions but such is todays world.
I know of no Fishing group that advocates the "decimation" of any species by any fishing interest and RFA amongst other groups have fought hard against commercial oversight when required and will continue to do so when its outside of the regulations (which we are always fighting for better).

The original Thread was about the Sanctuary update and while all opinions on commercial fishing are respected lets get back to the point of the OP (original poster).

Either you support the opposition of the Sanctuary and if so should be thankful of the efforts to stop it or you are FOR the Sanctuary and its your right to say so or not but would love to know your reasons.

[Gerry Zagorski]

Originally Posted by dales529

It appears statements are now answers to questions but such is todays world.
I know of no Fishing group that advocates the "decimation" of any species by any fishing interest and RFA amongst other groups have fought hard against commercial oversight when required and will continue to do so when its outside of the regulations (which we are always fighting for better).

The original Thread was about the Sanctuary update and while all opinions on commercial fishing are respected lets get back to the point of the OP (original poster).

Either you support the opposition of the Sanctuary and if so should be thankful of the efforts to stop it or you are FOR the Sanctuary and its your right to say so or not but would love to know your reasons.

Yep - Stay on topic and one fight at a time....

[NoLimit]

Originally Posted by dales529

It appears statements are now answers to questions but such is todays world.
I know of no Fishing group that advocates the "decimation" of any species by any fishing interest and RFA amongst other groups have fought hard against commercial oversight when required and will continue to do so when its outside of the regulations (which we are always fighting for better).

The original Thread was about the Sanctuary update and while all opinions on commercial fishing are respected lets get back to the point of the OP (original poster).

Either you support the opposition of the Sanctuary and if so should be thankful of the efforts to stop it or you are FOR the Sanctuary and its your right to say so or not but would love to know your reasons.

The original thread was about restoring the winter flounder, fluke, sea trout, and crab that used to spawn every year in the Sanctuary and they are now gone.

Of course none of the "fishing" organizations will admit to letting stock go extinct but that is what has happened in the last 20 years.

Remember Leroy's? "We Smoke Anything". That used to be whiting that were available by the sack full for years. But under the watch of our wonderful regulators, they are gone and so is Leroy's.

So dont cry about fish houses going out of business if we try to do something about draggers. It is already happening and local restaurants are having to serve pollack and cod and haddock imported from distant waters.

[bhackemup]

Way too much to talk about here so hopefully I'll catch up with you some day to continue our discussion...I am on my way to Neptune to get a fried WHITING sandwich at Jody's.

[NoLimit]

Originally Posted by bhackemup

Way too much to talk about here so hopefully I'll catch up with you some day to continue our discussion...I am on my way to Neptune to get a fried WHITING sandwich at Jody's.

They used to be "Baseball Bats". Now, it probably takes two to fill a hot dog bun. Hurry up before they have to be served on a cracker.

[dales529]

NoLimit
your post "The original thread was about restoring the winter flounder, fluke, sea trout, and crab that used to spawn every year in the Sanctuary and they are now gone."

What Sanctuary? Not to mention that the original post was about the efforts of RFA to stop the proposed Sanctuary for this area.

Its really OK you can just say you are FOR the sanctuary as that's obvious and yes you may possibly maybe get draggers off the area depending on the lobbying if the sanctuary were to go through but rest assured YOU (recreational) will be out of said sanctuary way before them and under regulations elsewhere you cant even begin to imagine to years to come.

[NoLimit]

Originally Posted by dales529

NoLimit
your post "The original thread was about restoring the winter flounder, fluke, sea trout, and crab that used to spawn every year in the Sanctuary and they are now gone."

What Sanctuary? Not to mention that the original post was about the efforts of RFA to stop the proposed Sanctuary for this area.

Its really OK you can just say you are FOR the sanctuary as that's obvious and yes you may possibly maybe get draggers off the area depending on the lobbying if the sanctuary were to go through but rest assured YOU (recreational) will be out of said sanctuary way before them and under regulations elsewhere you cant even begin to imagine to years to come.

Stop changing the subject.

The subject is the disappearance of fluke, flounder, weaks, and crab from the bays and rivers.

So far neither you or anyone else has provided an action plan to bring them back (along with whiting and ling) from extinction.

I want to know who will organize this effort. We did it with stripers and clams - now its time to finish the job.

PS - If you are not going to lead or follow, get out of the way.

[Capt Sal]

Originally Posted by NoLimit

Stop changing the subject.

The subject is the disappearance of fluke, flounder, weaks, and crab from the bays and rivers.

So far neither you or anyone else has provided an action plan to bring them back (along with whiting and ling) from extinction.

I want to know who will organize this effort. We did it with stripers and clams - now its time to finish the job.

PS - If you are not going to lead or follow, get out of the way.

First of all summer flounder "fluke'' spawn off shore. When you say ''we'' did it with stripers. Who are you refering to? Who will organize this effort? We as recreational fishermen along with the entire for hire ''recreational'' industry and the tackle and bait companies financing it.The RFA is one of the main ones but local fishing clubs all up and down the East coast contibute to this effort. Money is needed so i hope you did your part there and donated some $$$ and maybe attended a few meetings.

[Charlie B]

Getting back to the original question. I say support the RFA they seem to be the strongest voice we have fighting for us in this and all matters involving our rights to fish. I would guess many if not most of us already belong to the RFA but if your not we need all the support we can get. I know money can be tight but it does take money to fight for our rights. I believe supporting the RFA is money well spent. Now about the sanctuary look what happened in other sanctuaries. We don't want that and the RFA is against it. About the draggers the reason they get to take what they do is because they spend the money to lobby the govt. to get what they want. As I have said before I am not against all commercial fishing but certain gear is too efficient at making money by taking and killing all fish from the sea including by-catch and shorts. The regulations need to be changed. And it not just us as fisherman who suffer. The boat builders and dealers the tackle makers and dealers, bait and tackle shops, gas docks, marinas, the list goes on all have a stake in this. And we should all stick together. Support the RFA and other similar groups it's in our own best interest...Charlie