Miss Belmar - JUMBO blues, COD & a 30 lb STRIPER!

[stevelikes2fish]

I don't understand what's with all the comments. Boat went out, headed north, caugh fish. Why are there comments.

[chrislars]

Originally Posted by stevelikes2fish

I don't understand what's with all the comments. Boat went out, headed north, caugh fish. Why are there comments.

because, based on where bluefish and cod usually are, (more than 3 miles out) you cannot legally keep a striped bass

[Gerry Zagorski]

Well how about if they were offshore, moved inshore at the end of the day and got the Striper... Perfectly legal, right??

Besides that, not sure about all of you but I enjoy and get some good information reading these reports by our sponsors and contributors. Do we want to discourage people from posting their reports by making accusations like this??

If you want to take shots at someone, do it in person or in private.

If you feel compelled to take a shot at someone here, how about you give your full name and phone number on your post so they know who their accuser is. Notice their contact information is on their posts.

[stevelikes2fish]

Originally Posted by Gerry Zagorski

If you feel compelled to take a shot at someone here, how about you give your full name and phone number on your post so they know who their accuser is. Notice their contact information is on their posts.

Exactly. Glad I didn't post any pics from last year's cod catch, 0.8 miles off the beach.........

Why do people assume the fish were caught outside the legal area. Can never understand some of the senseless post I see on this site.

Anyway, nice to see the stripers and cod, congrats to the captain and fishermen.

[Gerry Zagorski]

We've also caught an occational Cod while fishing the inshore wrecks for Tog and Sea Bass.

[Billfish715]

Let me “man-up” about my reply. After re-reading what I wrote, I acknowledge my mistake. I apologize for any hard feelings it generated. The words did not properly reflect my reaction to the original post. Once it was specifically explained where the fish were caught, it all made sense. To mention the Mud Hole and cod and blues and a striper on the same trip without mention of the stop at the “rocks” raised an eyebrow. The fact that I was concerned and confused should come as no surprise. However, my concerns for ethical fishing practices should not be overlooked. If I called attention to a perceived transgression on someone’s part, I did so because I felt that it was my responsibility to help maintain the integrity of our sport. Again, I apologize for any misunderstanding and applaud this forum for accepting and promoting the professionalism of its sponsors. I hope, though, that this has called attention to the fact that we are all “ambassadors” for our sport and that any transgressions should be challenged. We have a right and a duty to do so. " Idiot forum"? I don't think so.

[skate king]

Originally Posted by Billfish715

Let me “man-up” about my reply. After re-reading what I wrote, I acknowledge my mistake. I apologize for any hard feelings it generated. The words did not properly reflect my reaction to the original post. Once it was specifically explained where the fish were caught, it all made sense. To mention the Mud Hole and cod and blues and a striper on the same trip without mention of the stop at the “rocks” raised an eyebrow. The fact that I was concerned and confused should come as no surprise. However, my concerns for ethical fishing practices should not be overlooked. If I called attention to a perceived transgression on someone’s part, I did so because I felt that it was my responsibility to help maintain the integrity of our sport. Again, I apologize for any misunderstanding and applaud this forum for accepting and promoting the professionalism of its sponsors. I hope, though, that this has called attention to the fact that we are all “ambassadors” for our sport and that any transgressions should be challenged. We have a right and a duty to do so. " Idiot forum"? I don't think so.

Bilfish715. This took a lot of "Integrity" on your part. I apologize if I questioned yours. It won't happen again. Yes, I agree some of the wrap ups of several days of fishing by some of the posts can be confusing and that's why it is best to confirm what the facts are before responding. One thing I did learn from a lot of this thread is that a lot of us really do care about our sport and it's future.
Good fishing

Jim Dennehy AKA Skate King

[Billfish715]

Originally Posted by skate king

Bilfish715. This took a lot of "Integrity" on your part. I apologize if I questioned yours. It won't happen again. Yes, I agree some of the wrap ups of several days of fishing by some of the posts can be confusing and that's why it is best to confirm what the facts are before responding. One thing I did learn from a lot of this thread is that a lot of us really do care about our sport and it's future.
Good fishing

Jim Dennehy AKA Skate King

There's no need for you to apologize. I appreciate the fact that we share the same concerns for the future of our sport. I'm sure if our positions were reversed, you would have spoken up too, especially if you thought someone had transgressed. You are the only one who seems to understand my motivation. You didn't stoop to sarcasm and responded as a mature adult and fellow fisherman. Thank you. Tight lines.

[JonDevin]

Wait a second. I did not stoop. I only pointed out my personal experience with the boat. I understand and share your motivation, but personally, I would've reached out directly to learn more before posting my questions publicly.

[Billfish715]

Originally Posted by JonDevin

Wait a second. I did not stoop. I only pointed out my personal experience with the boat. I understand and share your motivation, but personally, I would've reached out directly to learn more before posting my questions publicly.

No, you did not stoop and you didn't use sarcasm. Thanks for that. I don't disagree with your suggestion about responding. I just chose a different approach. This thread is over. Let's get back to fishing but continue to be diligent.