 |
|
Message Board
|
|
 |  | |
 |  | |
 |  | |
 |  | |
 | ||
|
|||||||
| NJFishing.com Fresh Water Fishing Post all your fresh water topics on this board |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
06-12-2012, 01:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Little or Big Swartswood?
Got the day off tomorrow and weather permitting would like to check out one of the Swartswoods. Never been to either before so looking for any info that may help me decide. I have a 16 ft deep V so wondering about the launching conditions at the Little S...I know the Big S has a good launch. Maybe both would be good to do?
Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks, Ken 
|
|
#2
06-12-2012, 03:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Little or Big Swartswood?
Big Swartswood is known for its Walleye while Little is known for its Tiger Musky. Big is EXTREMELY fishy with tons of dropoffs, ledges, submerged rocks/gravel. Its a pretty cool place to fish, especially after dark. I've yet to fish Little yet, but I do know its a lot smaller than the big lake. Why not try Little in the morning then Big after?
__________________
16' MirroCraft V-Hull 12.5' Perception Sport Sound 10' Pelican Pursuit Clam Kenai Pro Instagram: rjjasonek
|
|
#3
06-12-2012, 03:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Little or Big Swartswood?
Weather permitting is the question.
Supposed to clear up by noon, at least that is what I heard. 1-2" of rain over night  It's been raining steady in Berkeley Heights since noon. Love the big lake 
__________________
We live in a time where intelligent people are silenced so that stupid people won’t be offended. Last edited by Wilson; 06-13-2012 at 07:03 AM..
|
|
#4
06-12-2012, 08:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Little or Big Swartswood?
Thanks for the info guys...I took a look at the contour maps on fish and game and based on that and the two of you saying go BIG that's now the plan. Never caught a Walleye either so why not. If the weather cooperates and allows we'll hit the little one too just to check it out. I'll let you know what happens either way.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
