NJ Fishing Advertise Here at New Jersey's Number 1 Fishing Website!


Message Board


fish finder question - NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey


Message Board Registration       FAQ

Go Back   NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey > NJFishing.com Fresh Water Fishing
FAQ Members List Calendar

NJFishing.com Fresh Water Fishing Post all your fresh water topics on this board

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2016, 12:33 PM
Chrisper4694's Avatar
Chrisper4694 Chrisper4694 is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: hopatcong, nj
Posts: 4,389
Default fish finder question

I've been using the helix si since winter open water tinkering with it and I'm not all that impressed with the quality of the side imaging. Is it a lesser quality than other side imaging? are my settings off? I can't find anywhere that clearly explains how to adjust it to get the best results.

when you look at demos of it you can see stuff so much clearer. I feel like there must be a setting i need to tamper with. the regular sonar seems kind of off too. i ghetto rigged the transducer on a pvc arm, but it's straight and completely under the water and below the boat bottom so i doubt that's the issue.

anyone have a link to a really good tutorial or something? humminbirds site was very general and didn't help much. and all i see on youtube are promotional type videos selling the product.
__________________
14’ princecraft, aka The ‘Essential’
12' Tincan (unsinkable aluminum fishing machine)
https://www.fishidy.com/u/Multispeciesmayhem
https://www.instagram.com/chrisper_fishing/
https://www.facebook.com/mat.nelson.54
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2016, 01:43 PM
NJSquatch's Avatar
NJSquatch NJSquatch is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Da' Cong
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: fish finder question

I have been less than impressed as well but I haven't spent that much time tinkering with it yet. Have been more focused on wetting the lines. One thing that I have noticed is that I need to be going slow (3 mph) for it to give me clearer images anything over 5 and it is messy. Think it has something to do with my hull design creating too much air being stirred up going any faster.

Did you update the firmware? I bet your problem with SI is that the transducer isn't level. It needs to be a close to level as it can be when the boat is moving. Reduce the coverage distance to < 75'. I have been running at 50' to see what things look like. I see a pile of rocks or a down log and then drive by it.

Also get a micro sd card and record a trip. When back home you can review and tinker with the display settings to make things pop out.

As far as settings and videos check out stuff from Doug Vahrenberg on you tube. Doug and some of the HBird gurus are all over the BBC board. Some good information.
http://www.bbcboards.net/forumdisplay.php?f=133

Here is his recommended settings.


Last edited by NJSquatch; 04-28-2016 at 02:04 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2016, 02:28 PM
NJSquatch's Avatar
NJSquatch NJSquatch is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Da' Cong
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: fish finder question

here are some other settings that i have jotted down from various BBC posters

Under the Sonar tab ...:

*Beam frequency to 83kHz/200kHz to take advantage of the added detail of the 20° 200kHz cone and the wider 60° coverage of the 83kHz cone ...
*Switchfire Clear for water shallower than 10ft and adjust Sensitivity up to an acceptable amount of screen clutter ...
*Switchfire Max for water deeper than 10ft and adjust Sensitivity down to an acceptable amount of screen clutter ...
*Fish ID =On ... You will grow to like this over time ...
*Surface Clutter =as high a number as you can stand the upper clutter on the screen ... Lower numbers filter out good echoes too ...
*Noise Filter = Off ... Unless there are noticeable interference lines on the screen ...
*Max Depth to 10ft below actual water depth for best ping performance ...

SI Range to less than 50ft until your eyes are trained to pick up things farther away ...

Under the SI Enhance menu ...:
*SI Sensitivity = adjust up to brighten/down to darken ...
*SI Contrast = 10-12 ... Higher to make harder structure stand out more (also makes image grainy) ...
*SI Sharpness = Off ... Higher to make fish echoes pop out (also makes image grainy) ...

Chart speed ...:
*Higher when viewing 2d for faster screen refresh ...
*Match boat speed when viewing SI for best perspective ratio of structure actual shape ...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-28-2016, 07:25 PM
jimmythegreek's Avatar
jimmythegreek jimmythegreek is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,212
Default Re: fish finder question

the biggest problem with your units is you have the compact SI transducer, not the HDSI. I had a 798 a few years ago and it was night and day to the HDSI Im using now. theres no substiture for screen size and transducer frequency, and it takes time to learn the side imaging, it took me a full season to learn it well. What I did is set the bow unit to 2D sonar and the console to SI and brought the sides into 100ft and look for the marks and structure you see on the bow unit when the back passes over you know what it then looks like and you learn it. thats my best advice
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2016, 07:57 PM
XXlyakattacker's Avatar
XXlyakattacker XXlyakattacker is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pohatcong, NJ
Posts: 309
Default Re: fish finder question

I find if I keep it out a short distance that I can identify things better. I did like my 2d lowrance sonar better though. My issue with it is that when I run my auto chart live and get some contours going on my map it isn't there the next time I go out to the same spot. Sucks when your powered by the paddle.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20160428_194513.jpg
Views:	262
Size:	68.5 KB
ID:	95338  
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-29-2016, 07:13 AM
Chrisper4694's Avatar
Chrisper4694 Chrisper4694 is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: hopatcong, nj
Posts: 4,389
Default Re: fish finder question

i did the updates and micro card stuff but i'm the complete opposite of a tech guy. I have noticed some of those tips already, but i'll try making some more of the adjustments. I look at the demos and think wow that looks great, then i'm out on the water and i think, what the hell am i looking at...is that a bait ball? weeds? can't tell.
__________________
14’ princecraft, aka The ‘Essential’
12' Tincan (unsinkable aluminum fishing machine)
https://www.fishidy.com/u/Multispeciesmayhem
https://www.instagram.com/chrisper_fishing/
https://www.facebook.com/mat.nelson.54
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-29-2016, 07:27 AM
NJSquatch's Avatar
NJSquatch NJSquatch is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Da' Cong
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: fish finder question

Quote:
Originally Posted by XXlyakattacker View Post
I find if I keep it out a short distance that I can identify things better. I did like my 2d lowrance sonar better though. My issue with it is that when I run my auto chart live and get some contours going on my map it isn't there the next time I go out to the same spot. Sucks when your powered by the paddle.
It is my understanding that the unit only records 8 hours on the internal memory then starts over writing the data. I think you need a zero line card to save the autochart live information for future > 8 hours use. Good ol Hbird getting deeper into your wallet.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-01-2016, 09:53 AM
Ken Lyons Ken Lyons is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 206
Default Re: fish finder question

When you cram large amounts of data onto a small screen detail is lost. If you use bottom lock you can often eliminate much of what you don't care about and see what you do in far greater detail. The same goes for SI. Shorter distances will display better. Too, bigger screens are better. The detail can be there but it gets buried under all that data.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-01-2016, 10:18 PM
Chrisper4694's Avatar
Chrisper4694 Chrisper4694 is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: hopatcong, nj
Posts: 4,389
Default Re: fish finder question

7" was about the biggest i was going to get. i hate technology...you can never quite spend enough money to stay with the curve...
__________________
14’ princecraft, aka The ‘Essential’
12' Tincan (unsinkable aluminum fishing machine)
https://www.fishidy.com/u/Multispeciesmayhem
https://www.instagram.com/chrisper_fishing/
https://www.facebook.com/mat.nelson.54
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-02-2016, 07:15 AM
NJSquatch's Avatar
NJSquatch NJSquatch is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Da' Cong
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: fish finder question

I tinkered with mine a bit on Saturday after the bite died down. Definitely night and day difference in a deeper water (>10+ vs <4'). The SI was super clear. Still have to go slow (<4mph) to get clearer images but I totally see what all the rage is about. Found a nice submerged rocky point.

Agree with the tech curve, all the tech in the world isn't going to catch the fish. I just don't see the need for dual > 9" ff on the bow and console, 360 degree scanning, dual shallow water anchors, etc.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.