NJ Fishing Advertise Here at New Jersey's Number 1 Fishing Website!


Message Board


Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19" - Page 2 - NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey


Message Board Registration       FAQ

Go Back   NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey > NJFishing.com Salt Water Fishing
FAQ Members List Calendar

NJFishing.com Salt Water Fishing Use this board to post all general salt water fishing information. Please use the appropriate boards below for all other information. General information about sailing times, charter availability and open boats trips can be found and should be posted in the open boat forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-11-2017, 02:12 PM
Sharkyispy's Avatar
Sharkyispy Sharkyispy is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sarasota FL
Posts: 2,897
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Spoke with a capt on the water today. This will very critical to the fishing boat business and communities......Sad...
__________________
Mike Reynolds
[email]Sharkbite_Bucktails@aol.com
23' Parker Deep V
Supporter and Member of RFA/NJ
IGFA Member
www.sharkbite-bucktails.com
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-11-2017, 02:19 PM
Ttmako Ttmako is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 119
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocky View Post
Are you 100% positive that Macarthur didn't contact the commerce secretary?
He wrote a letter along with a few other representatives.
I have been in contact with his office pretty frequently. I pleaded with him to go and meet with Mr. Ross. I told him who to speak with to become informed. It was all teed up for him. All he had to do was show up.
So, yes other than signing a letter that someone else wrote, I m confident he didn't meet with Mr. Ross.
In addition, last night I received a call from his office and they told me and I quote "there is nothing he can do to help you".
What did his office tell you?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-11-2017, 02:51 PM
Chris G's Avatar
Chris G Chris G is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlantic Highlands
Posts: 1,138
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Any news on sea bass? Did I read correctly that we are getting royally screwed in the fall???? Again???
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-11-2017, 03:06 PM
Rocky's Avatar
Rocky Rocky is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 495
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris G View Post
Any news on sea bass? Did I read correctly that we are getting royally screwed in the fall???? Again???
Yep. 5 fish, a shorter season, and no lube.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-11-2017, 03:12 PM
Walleyed Walleyed is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Allamuchy
Posts: 506
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocky View Post
Yep. 5 fish, a shorter season, and no lube.
That's going to kill the December offshore sea bass trips....no one is going to want to pay that much money for 5 fish.
__________________
Jim

"Marie's Dream" 1985 21' Trophy
Homeport: Allamuchy, NJ
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-11-2017, 03:16 PM
Chris G's Avatar
Chris G Chris G is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlantic Highlands
Posts: 1,138
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocky View Post
Yep. 5 fish, a shorter season, and no lube.
Wow. What a joke.

Pathetic.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-11-2017, 03:18 PM
Rocky's Avatar
Rocky Rocky is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 495
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

This is why the new Commerce Secretary HAS to get involved.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-11-2017, 03:35 PM
Detour66's Avatar
Detour66 Detour66 is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,522
Unhappy Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

3 @ 19" is not acceptable ...3 @ 18 is not acceptable! 5 @ 18" was better 8 @ 17" even better. They are chipping away at us. Do I want to keep more fish than I can eat....No! But I do want to bring some fish home. I say recreational fisherman should consider somehow joining forces with the NRA then we will have lobbying power. It would benefit both parties. Time to make a stand. While we can!
__________________
2014 Sea Hunt 234 Ultra

Live to Fish. Fish to Live!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-11-2017, 03:55 PM
Flukemeister1 Flukemeister1 is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 480
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

What are the consequences of being out of compliance?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-11-2017, 03:59 PM
togzilla togzilla is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 333
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

This is not about managing the species but managing the anglers who target them out of existence. They know exactly what they are doing. How many party boats and charter boats will call it quits after this season under the proposed 3 fish at 18 inches? What are they going to fish for after Sept. 4th? Once the boats, marina, tackle stores call it quits they are not coming back. I'd love to be a fly on the wall at one of these ASMFC meetings when it is just those pricks talking amongst themselves and patting themselves on the back for slowly and systematically destroying the recreational fishery.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.