NJ Fishing Advertise Here at New Jersey's Number 1 Fishing Website!


Message Board


Female-Male Fluke - Page 2 - NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey


Message Board Registration       FAQ

Go Back   NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey > NJFishing.com Salt Water Fishing
FAQ Members List Calendar

NJFishing.com Salt Water Fishing Use this board to post all general salt water fishing information. Please use the appropriate boards below for all other information. General information about sailing times, charter availability and open boats trips can be found and should be posted in the open boat forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-17-2015, 03:33 PM
makosnax's Avatar
makosnax makosnax is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 397
Default Re: Female-Male Fluke

Shooting unlimited does is implemented to reduce the overall population. It seems to be working just as well on fluke and bass.
__________________
You got to hookem to cookem!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-17-2015, 03:58 PM
Capt Sal Capt Sal is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seawaren
Posts: 2,432
Default Re: Female-Male Fluke

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poncho View Post
Not a big salt guy but do read everyone's posts. Interesting topic here. I'm just curious, NJ has implemented on the hunting side of things that hunters can shoot an unlimited amount of does (with proper permit). It is to get the male/female ratio more males than females to produce bigger racks on the bucks which definitely seems to have worked. Maybe fluke is just the opposite. Less females more males produce bigger females? Are you guys seeing bigger size fluke showing in your catches?
Unlimited does was implemented to reduce the herds.Antler restriction and reducing bag limits from two to one buck is why we are seeing bigger antlers.With less females in the fish world =less fish of any size.Fish like deer need age to grow big.As was said on another post,we have to take the scientists to court and make them prove there findings. We would need our own scientists to do a study and repute the fisheries management scientists.This would take time and more money then we could raise.We need a turn coat from fisheries management to come on our side and say they were wrong in court. Now that is someone worth ``buying''!!!!!

ntists in the high courts.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.