![]() |
|
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ||
|
|||||||
| NJFishing.com Salt Water Fishing Use this board to post all general salt water fishing information. Please use the appropriate boards below for all other information. General information about sailing times, charter availability and open boats trips can be found and should be posted in the open boat forum. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Learn this history and don't forget it. Otherwise you may end up wondering what ever happened to all those stripers we were catching back in the first decades of the 21st century. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
If there was a nation wide ban on commercial landings of striped bass we would not need the EEZ restriction!NJ does not allow commercial landing of striped bass so we have to worry about the out of state boats.Maryland and Virginia are main offenders.I am sure we will read about another greedy netter taking tons of illegal bass in Chesapeak Bay.
__________________
Capt Sal 100 Ton Master Semi Retired |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you re-read my post, I have no problem with conservation efforts to save these fish and I applaud the "victory" conservationists have created for all saltwater anglers who target striped bass. That has NOTHING to do with the EEZ. I am also not complaining about regulations per se, my complaint is with enforcement of a ridiculous law that is still in place and should be lifted. This law was NOT enforced for over 20 years of it's implementation, now suddenly the USCG has decided to actively pursue any vagrant past the 3 mile line that MAY have a striper on board. Come on man. This is over-regulation and if this "law" was so vital to the survival of striped bass, why didn't the USCG and F&W enforce it in the early 90's till say, 2010? The EEZ was created to protect bass from COMMERCIAL fishermen(as YOU said in your thread above), and the intent was to ALLOW recreational anglers to catch stripers and keep their 2 fish. Prior to the moratorium, yes these fish were virtually extinct, and yes, it took a great deal of effort to restore the stocks to where they have been, but let's not make my comments into something they are not. And FYI #2 - Dick Russell is a great author, and Striper Wars is a great book and really does touch on some of the bigger issues that have surrounded conservation of striped bass in the last 30 years -- I've read it three times, cover to cover Feel free to continue to "educate" folks like me bud ![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Captain, take another look at pages 301-303 of STRIPER WARS. The ban on fishing for stripers in the EEZ began in 1990 and applies to everybody. The Coast Guard was not enforcing the ban until some RECREATIONAL anglers saw the slaughter by of soon-to-spawn females in the EEZ by recreational boats. Jim Price, a fifth-generation waterman (and one of the true heroes of the fight to save menhaden), saw about 50 recreational boats massacring these females 6 miles off the NC coast and raised hell with the Coast Guard--as he should have.
If that 3-mile line is not enforced, we will pay a big price. Now, thanks to the ban, we have lots of bass inshore where small boats, not to mention surf fishers, can enjoy these great fish. When the stripers are migrating they pour into our inshore waters except when the bait isn't here. The problem intermittently last fall and a lot of the time this fall was the absence of bunkers. Even when the stripers were here, they were often feeding on rain fish or sand eels and wouldn't look at a jig. To have those really great fall days, we need to save the bunker, which are in serious trouble. BTW, I was born in 1934, and I'm thrilled by the NJ striper fishing we have, thanks to that great victory. So forgive me if I sound a little preachy. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I respectfully disagree with your bolded statement above. Are you referring to peanut bunker or adult bunker? Whatever the case, we have had MANY falls when there were no bunker present; peanuts, or adult sized bunker and have caught fish on jigs and plugs from the boat, especially when these fish were feeding on sandeels. We had literally SHOALS of sandeels present this fall, and getting these fish to bite jigs was extremely difficult. Bunker are not the main reason why bass migrate inside the 3 mile line in the fall - there are other reasons. Yes, they usually get finicky and border on going on lockjaw if the PRIMARY forage is rainfish, but most of these bass we had this fall were sandeel-fed. In recent years, especially 2010-2012, and in years like 07-09', we had the sandeels big time and caught the bass extremely well both from the boat and from the surf. This year? I just don't get what happened. Fish were there, sandeels were there, and getting them to bite a jig from a boat was difficult. FWIW, as soon as we put sandeel imitations in the water while trolling, we would double and triple up so it makes little sense. As I implied above, sandeels are the primary forage for fall bass and their location is usually where the bass congregate and migrate to. Bunker have little to do with the fall migration. Now why did a good amount of bass migrate well offshore of 3 miles? Simple. Their migration pattern changed again this year. Huge bodies of bass that set up off LI and gorged on sandeels for WEEKS usually stream southward along the Jersey shore, off between 8-15 miles (as they take a direct path from central LI) to their wintering grounds to the south. They eventually work their way inshore somewhere between Cape May and the Delmarva. It's like that in the fall, and it's like that in the spring when the smaller fish (not the hogs!) migrate back and forth. (FYI - Cape May boats that are still at it are destroying the bass right now!) Years that those migrating bass don't set up off LI, we have similar fishing in our area (Fall of 11' is a prime example) that they had on LI this year. Yes, there is bait offshore,, but these fish are taking a "highway" south and are using that offshore route (well past 3 miles, sometimes up to 20 off) to get where they need to go. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
We have no cows out 10-15 miles, those are the fish that do migrate up our beach, so again, why are we suddenly enforcing this law coastwide based on a one-time or one-incident (one meaning a string of incidents) that happened 500 miles away? Makes no sense to punish the majority if the minority is making the infraction. Yes I know this is FEDERAL law, but some sort of middle ground has to be met on a state-by-state basis regarding how stripers populate the area and migrate to and from the area. The over-enforcing the EEZ is another knee-jerk reaction by our government, which speaks to bigger problems we have in this country nowadays. Sorry, just my $.02 ![]() |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
As we all know bait is the key to any fishery.The absence of herring does not help either.It is a crying shame that the younger generations may never get a chance to experience the inshore Bluefin tuna runs like we had 30 and 40 years ago.No whiting and ling in big numbers means no mud hole tuna run!When any fish migrates it is on a mission.Bait holds them for awhile but they will still migrate.Stripers are no different.They will migrate up the Hudson to spawn no matter what.If the bay is full of bunker at the time of there migration we catch.This spring will tell the tale of our bunker population.
![]()
__________________
Capt Sal 100 Ton Master Semi Retired |
![]() |
|
|