My point basically is that they identify an Osprey issue exits but reject that its attributed to lack of bunker because they cant agree on the "trend analysis" used in the data as bunker trawls dont go back far enough so common sense from people on the water was used and ignorned.
Then they agree that a bunker problem exists but reject that its Omega or pollution as the "trend analysis" can NOT be agreed to
Then they agree that a Striper problem exists but screw the analysis and lets cut recreational fishermen!
Its no wonder we fight an uphill battle.
BB: Guess you have to change your "trend analysis" data as no one cares
