NJ Fishing Advertise Here at New Jersey's Number 1 Fishing Website!


Message Board


Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19" - Page 3 - NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey


Message Board Registration       FAQ

Go Back   NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey > NJFishing.com Salt Water Fishing
FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

NJFishing.com Salt Water Fishing Use this board to post all general salt water fishing information. Please use the appropriate boards below for all other information. General information about sailing times, charter availability and open boats trips can be found and should be posted in the open boat forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-11-2017, 04:20 PM
Ttmako Ttmako is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 119
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Quote:
Originally Posted by togzilla View Post
This is not about managing the species but managing the anglers who target them out of existence. They know exactly what they are doing. How many party boats and charter boats will call it quits after this season under the proposed 3 fish at 18 inches? What are they going to fish for after Sept. 4th? Once the boats, marina, tackle stores call it quits they are not coming back. I'd love to be a fly on the wall at one of these ASMFC meetings when it is just those pricks talking amongst themselves and patting themselves on the back for slowly and systematically destroying the recreational fishery.
This is an excellent point and one that I hadn't really thought about. I think you may be onto something here.
That being said, there are some ASMFC members who are truly recreational fisherman. Yes, some of them are either Environmental zealots or commercial oriented. I think we should take a look at the committees underneath the council, specifically, the SSC and TC. These are more than likely environmental lunatics with an agenda closely matched to what you said. If you dig deep enough, I'm sure Pew and the EDF are providing some sort of funding to them.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-11-2017, 04:26 PM
dales529 dales529 is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,813
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flukemeister1 View Post
What are the consequences of being out of compliance?
July 1 start date, 2 fish at 20" and I believe a 59 day season
__________________
SUPPORTER / CONTRIBUTOR SSFFF
RFA-NJ Member
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-11-2017, 04:30 PM
Ry609's Avatar
Ry609 Ry609 is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Clark, NJ
Posts: 206
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Quote:
Originally Posted by dales529 View Post
July 1 start date, 2 fish at 20" and I believe a 59 day season
I'd be curious to see who would be sent here to enforce that given the NJDEP's position on the matter. Both of these options suck, but I think I would've rather had the longer season than the 1" less size if the bag limit was going to stay at 3.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-11-2017, 04:42 PM
henro henro is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Hackettstown, NJ
Posts: 346
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Quote:
Originally Posted by dales529 View Post
July 1 start date, 2 fish at 20" and I believe a 59 day season
__________________
2003 Lund 2025 Pro V
Dirty Hooker IV
Hookin ain't easy!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-11-2017, 05:03 PM
Ttmako Ttmako is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 119
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Given the hard work and effort The NJ DEP put into this debacle and the confusion this is causing to recreational anglers, I would venture many DEP officers maybe somewhat more lenient with this years rules.
Just my guess.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-11-2017, 05:06 PM
Ttmako Ttmako is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 119
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

For the record,
I don't think we should have stuck with 3@19".
This was certainly worth a fight and the effort many put forth.
This still isn't over.
There is a rather lengthy protocol that needs to be followed when out of compliance.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-11-2017, 05:30 PM
frugalfisherman frugalfisherman is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,199
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Either way i,m not throwing back a fluke alive!!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-11-2017, 05:48 PM
Flygaff Flygaff is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 452
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

What planet do these people come from. There is so much data to support an increase in recreational fishing and they just don't get it. It has to be the commercial lobbies that fuel these issues. I am so fed up. For me. I pay taxes , I served my country in the military. If I want to keep fish. I WILL. I encourage everyone else to follow suit. How much damage to the environment could I possibly cause if I bring home 8 fluke, or 18 Sea Bass? This is just crazy. I have seen the commercials several times dump their nets. Dead fish as far as you can see. How about limit them to pounds caught and no throw backs. If all the come up with are mullet, than that is what they get. They throw back fish because they can continue fishing and catch a more valuable species. I am beginning to hate my own country due to the corruption that is so rampant.

Just my 2 cents. of course it is now only worth 0.002 cents.

Good luck out there everyone and be safe
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-12-2017, 04:59 AM
Abrasion Abrasion is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 136
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

If you operate a charter boat, 3@18" and a shorter season just killed you. 3@19 with a longer season made more sense. Let's be honest, this outcome is a failure all around.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-12-2017, 07:28 AM
captmark captmark is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Point Pleasant
Posts: 452
Default Re: Looks like we should have taken 3 @ 19"

Gentleman, look at this way, Fluke 3 @ 19 or 18" and the Sea Bass being cut to 5 fish. Take a look at the docks in your area, more and more head boats are being sold, more charter boats are leaving (us included) if you need proof just in Point Pleasant alone, Cock Robin sold, Bogans fleet reduced, the Islander sold many other 6 packs have either folded or sold yeah some new ones have started but it is a fact they dont care about this industry that helps support other local businesses. Many of us filled out the survey that they wanted to see if the cut backs would hurt us and local businesses, I guess that went in the trash.
Just my 1 cent oh they took the other cent
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.