Questions about NJ trout

[thmyorke1]

From what I understand, the majority of trout in NJ are stocked, and only a few streams (other than some reservoirs and lakes) support natural trout production.

What I don't understand; what happens to these thousands of trout? Are they simply just fished out by anglers or do they just not survive some waters such? Im curious to know what factors influence if the stream is trout-sustainable or not.

One last note- North branch or south branch of the Raritan? And im talking about the convergence area since thats most local for me. From the stocking info it seems like the South Branch is better stocked but it's only stocked on the northern part- up between Spruce Run and RV.

Thanks!

[Jigman13]

All info is in fish and game website. Just Google nj trout

[thmyorke1]

Originally Posted by Jigman13

All info is in fish and game website. Just Google nj trout

I got stocking info there but cant seem to find anything else other than some facts here and there. Sorry but the site's layout is pretty confusing

[Jigman13]

Originally Posted by thmyorke1

I got stocking info there but cant seem to find anything else other than some facts here and there. Sorry but the site's layout is pretty confusing

Agreed but most of the answers to your questions are buried there. Stocking numbers in each particular body of water, fall, spring and winter schedules, designated wild trout streams, trout conservation areas, etc.

Def more fish stocked in s branch. Just look at the numbers...

Also, as stated, largely put and take fishery. Between anglers, predation and varying water conditions, I'd say it's a safe assumption a small percentage hold over. The cormorants alone consume serious numbers statewide.

[Chrisper4694]

Def some rewarding surprises out there in no...then again you could just go to ny or pa and pretty much blow any trout fishing you could do here out of the water haha.

[thmyorke1]

Originally Posted by Chrisper4694

Def some rewarding surprises out there in no...then again you could just go to ny or pa and pretty much blow any trout fishing you could do here out of the water haha.

Im guessing the waters there are more suitable for natural production. Let alone the waters connecting to the Great Lakes- steelhead are incredible.

[thmyorke1]

Thanks RJ and Jigman, Im interested in reading about water conditions like that, if anyone has quick links to them. Why is it just the northern waters anyways? Something to do with the soil of the river beds? Or just pollution is lighter up there?

[23cardinal]

Originally Posted by thmyorke1

Thanks RJ and Jigman, Im interested in reading about water conditions like that, if anyone has quick links to them. Why is it just the northern waters anyways? Something to do with the soil of the river beds? Or just pollution is lighter up there?

Sorry didn't see this less fertilizer run off clearer water colder more rocky stone bottoms. Less population all of it. Multifactoral. I'll pm u the links once I re find them

[RJHooker]

I have heard about 10 % hold over, but i think that is an upper limit for stockies in ideal conditions. Most of the northern rivers except for the big 5, are put and take. Maybe a handfull survive and are extremely dufficult to catch. Anything from stress to predidation wipe them out. I think only 40 to 60% are taken by anglers depending on location. The herons are well fed at our expense.

NJDEP has lots of data from studies. I am not sure what constitutes Trout Production waters, but i am guessing water polution and the watersheds overall health (temps, flows etc.). But the few production waters are the best place,to find wilds and hold overs. I am not even sure how the native brookie population is since i have never caught one.

The are some members here who know a lot more than me regarding heritage, natives, and wilds.