![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
|
NJFishing.com Fisheries Management/Regulations This board is closed for posting but will serve as an archieve for all Fisheries Management and Regulations posts from other boards. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I fish out of What I call Central NJ. I can fish out of BI or LEI. I can't just pick one since I fish all of them accept the surf.
__________________
Capt. Fran Verdi Francesca Marie 27' CC May-Craft RFA-NJ Member www.rfanj.org SSFFF Contributer |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Garone custom rods, Please remember that site has a following that comes from North NJ. You can see this buy the list of charter boats that are on the site. The poll that was run on this site option 2 and 5 were very close.
__________________
Capt. Fran Verdi Francesca Marie 27' CC May-Craft RFA-NJ Member www.rfanj.org SSFFF Contributer |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It is what it is. Changing the subject, Capt Fran, I know it's ealy but looking forward to the RFA trips this year, keep me posted. Thanks.
__________________
Jay Santiago "For the rich there is therapy for the rest of us there is fishing" "A bad day of fishing turns into a good day of drinking" ![]() ![]() |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Don't bother me while I'm fishing |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I thought the Board stated that the "NJ Volunteer Program" was the "science" that they used, not MRFFFFFSSSSSSSSSS ???__________________
Either the MRFSS or the NJVAS may be used in developing regulations. Usually the MRFSS data is used but for the fluke regualtions in 2011, NJVAS data was used. The NJMFC may use either provided all the options are approved by the ASMFC. I am glad you brought that up because our state biologists are urging fishermen to particiapate in the program. They particularly request that occaisional and less experienced fishermen take the survey so that the data does not become skewed by the more experienced fishermen. Last year I logged in 182 trips, which whas more than anyone in the state. The more data they receive, the more accurate if becomes. This info. is used to help the fishermen of NJ, not hurt them. The NJMFC will usually opt to use the most favorable data for us whether it comes from the MRFSS or or the NJVAS. PLEASE help out by participating in the survey by logging in your trips at the link below. Paul 2nd VP JCAA member - BSC, NJOA, NJBBA, SF http://www.njfishandwildlife.com/marinesurvey.htm |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Jay Santiago "For the rich there is therapy for the rest of us there is fishing" "A bad day of fishing turns into a good day of drinking" ![]() ![]() |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Been tied up way too long with work (not complaining mind you) but have been following whats going on and especially with this thread.
As differing opinions are as common as fishing reports on here with what option was chosen by the board that is all well and good. There is no way any option picked was going to appease everyone so its no suprise that there is a divide. personally I would have gone with option 2 but again thats the benefit of having "choices" to discuss and vote on. What is really disturbing is the lack of memory when it comes to how those "choices" were arrived at. Without the tireless work of some that are being bashed here you would never have had a reason to post your thoughts. To even remotely pin blame on any fishing group that represents the best interest of NJ anglers is disgusting to say the least. Do you forget the 99% of all the good that has gone on with Fluke quotas, seasons etc because you dont like the vote??? Last year the Back bay, Surf guys were pissed. This year otheres are pissed. Guess what we all won before hand by even having a choice. The votes were by personal anglers NOT Groups. The work that goes on ahead of giving you a "choice" is what counts and you are all damn lucky we had a choice. To see comment on where do i send my money now or I am no longer going to support so and so is beyond my comprehension because you obviously dont understand what the real issues are and WHO is fighting for YOU. Jay: Not to worry, RFA-NJ trips will be posted up soon.
__________________
SUPPORTER / CONTRIBUTOR SSFFF RFA-NJ Member |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The reason 5 Fluke is not enough.First off i spend my hard earned money to fluke fish,love to eat it year round and pack my freezer with it.Why are we giving up bag limit to a fishery the is rebuilt and then some
![]() ![]() ![]() |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Exactly Dales.....
The way I look at this is we might not have had any Fluke season if organizations like the RFA and SSFFF and individuals like Adam, Fran and Tony who volunteer their time had not been involved. Lastly, we are all on the same team. Do we have differing opinions on the options, sure...Would I have preffered option 2, yep but that does not does not mean I'm going to through my brother under the bus because he has minor difference of opinion to mine. We need to keep in mind the bigger picture here. Our rights to fish are under constant pressure and common sense tells me we would not be as effective if we tried to protect them individually. We need to do it as part of the team. There is no "I" in TEAM and Together Everyone Accomplishes More. It's the big stuff we need to stay united on and we can't let the little things divide us.
__________________
Gerry Zagorski <>< Founder/Owner of NJFishing.com since 1997 Proud Supporter of SSFFF and RFA NJFishing@aol.com Obsession 28 Carolina Classic Sandy Hook Area |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|