Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Exit14a
|
That really sounds scary.....I wondering if those closures would be anything like the massive santuary areas that fisherman where shut out of a few years ago.Talk about taking away our rights.It was unreal with one stroke of a pen a former president could take away thousands of square miles of fishing areas under the guise of a "santuary". Now that was total bs. I would like to take more than 5 minutes to read the quoted"recently published federal document" and better inform myself and not take some company spokesman word for it.. Anybody have a link to the paper.Anybody know what the goal of the "task force" was. Information without a spin is where I believe our true strength can come from.That will give the fishing community the strong common bonds ( love of fishing,access,ect ) that can unite us rather than political agendas and misinformation that can tear us apart. I have seen countless times in just the last few weeks massive amouts of wrong,incorrect and down right BS posted all over the net passed off as gospel along with some great very informitive and very accuate infromation. Although I do not not know if I share any of CaptTB or Capt Adams political views or even any social views thier post always seem to contain statments back by facts (with links). Give all the information and then I will decide. What would you call this group of people ... they have been fighting ocean sand mining,wind farms off our beaches,LNG projects off Sandy Hook,the massive slaughter of fish from nuke plant water intakes, and run off into our local water sheds..........."liberal enviormental wackos"or just concerned fisherman? I think it would depend on many things to decide such as who posted it,what site,what context,whats th authors true agenda,how much information was included or how much was left out. Sometimes a little research can give a totally differnt point of view(if one has an open mind).
