NJ Fishing Advertise Here at New Jersey's Number 1 Fishing Website!


Message Board


NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey - View Single Post - Raritan Bay Pipeline
View Single Post
  #14  
Old 04-25-2019, 12:49 PM
akoop's Avatar
akoop akoop is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 420
Default Re: Raritan Bay Pipeline

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie B View Post
I don't know where you got your information from but if you want the actual environmental impact statement here it is. Actual fact not emotion...Charlie

https://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/...EIS/part-1.pdf
This is extracted from the PDF file you kinked to:

Transco proposes to dispose of acceptable material at the USACE-managed Historic Area
Remediation Site (HARS), a 15.7 square nautical mile area in the Atlantic Ocean, approximately 7.7
nautical miles south of Rockaway, New York. The HARS previously received contaminated sediments
and other materials during 63 years of disposal activity, and the USACE is now capping the area with
dredged material that meets certain USACE and EPA chemical criteria and which would not cause
significant undesirable effects, including through bioaccumulation. In September 2017, Transco submitted
an application to the USACE for a permit under section 103 of the MPRSA to transport and dispose of
dredge material at the HARS and continues to consult with the USACE regarding potential use of the
HARS. For dredge material determined unsuitable for disposal at the HARS, Transco has secured
preliminary agreement to dispose of the material at licensed onshore facilities in Kearney and Jersey City,
New Jersey. Transco may side-cast dredge material derived from portions of anchorage area 28 and
between MPs 35.2 and 35.5 and re-use this material as backfill if approved by the NYSDEC; otherwise,
these dredge materials would also be disposed of at approved onshore or offshore sites.

So it sounds to me that contaminated material will be disposed of both in the water and on the land. In my opinion it is better not to dredge up this material.
Reply With Quote