Quote:
Originally Posted by shucker
The correct answer here is fisheries science sucks..always has and always will. We continue to make restrictions,accusations,and allot of finger pointing based of flawed data.
|
Surveys, reports, conclusions, scientific studies, whatever...........there is always something omitted from the data which, if included, would change the results. In this case, we are led to believe that there is something severely affecting the migration of American shad. What variables were included in the study? Was the water flow, or water temperature, or turbidity, or PH, etc, etc, etc. considered?
So the results of the tagging and tracking are in. Now what? I know! How about another scientific study? What have we learned from the first study? How that information will be used is the bigger question. Does anyone know the answer? I think we need a survey.
