![]() |
Inshore seabass: conventional or spinning?
What do you prefer, conventional or spinning gear?
Just wondering what everyone prefers. |
Re: Inshore seabass: conventional or spinning?
Fairly light conventional tackle, 12-20lb rod, 30lb braid, 25lb top shot. In my opinion, spinning sucks for bottomfishing.
|
Re: Inshore seabass: conventional or spinning?
Quote:
|
Re: Inshore seabass: conventional or spinning?
Agreed..conventional
|
Re: Inshore seabass: conventional or spinning?
conventional !!!!!
Avet SXJ , SX MXL or MXJ Shimano Tek600 or Tek500 Daiwa STTLW 20 or 30 , STTBG 20 or 30 The list goes on and on !!!!! |
Re: Inshore seabass: conventional or spinning?
Conventional....... maybe even an acid wrap if your going to use it for other types of fishing.
Spinning is the most natural feel you will get with a rod. The line is centered below the rod blank, eliminating twist and saving stress in your wrists and arms. An acid wrap offers you the best of both worlds. Rod stays natural, plus benefits of conventional reel. I know many guys who use it for bottom fishing. |
Re: Inshore seabass: conventional or spinning?
I use an Avet SX on a Seeker East Coast BA-270 7'
Works a treat. |
Re: Inshore seabass: conventional or spinning?
It's inshore sea bass not grouper fishing.
Drop bait down Reel fish up Use what you got. |
Re: Inshore seabass: conventional or spinning?
I use a trinidad 14a with a seeker inshore lite spiral wrap.
|
Re: Inshore seabass: conventional or spinning?
With the potential for hooking up a double of 3-4 lb. fish I prefer my standard, Avet SX on a Lami Inshore classic rod, with 20# braid. I did use my SX-J but I found it to be just a little to small for the job. I agree with the others about using spinning gear for bottom fishing.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.