![]() |
Updated Trout Stocked Waters
Which trout stocked waters do you think can be removed from the stocking list? Which waters can afford to have their allocations reduced? Does the state need to stock trout in lakes that are managed for muskies? Should lakes with very limited shoreline access have their quotas reduced? I know that the numbers of stocked trout have been the same since forever. Shouldn't there be an updated accounting? What are your ideas?
|
Re: Updated Trout Stocked Waters
Good question. Id reconsider the stocking points that lay on Wild Trout Streams. I cant say much about other bodies of water. There's such a large # of spring stockies that it's understandable how they're tossed everywhere to make all the anglers of the state interested.
|
Re: Updated Trout Stocked Waters
Any water listed NO KILL should get NO TROUT.
|
Re: Updated Trout Stocked Waters
Quote:
|
Re: Updated Trout Stocked Waters
Quote:
|
Re: Updated Trout Stocked Waters
Quote:
|
Re: Updated Trout Stocked Waters
Remove trout stocking from the urban/public ponds. Trout are taken before opening day, people fishing without licenses.
The conservation officers are spread thin enough and can not patrol the entire state every day. This stock fish in urban areas plan to try to increase interest or license sales does not work but yet some good lakes in Sussex, Morris and Passaic Counties have been dropped from stocking over the years. |
Re: Updated Trout Stocked Waters
Quote:
|
Re: Updated Trout Stocked Waters
Im pretty sure "no kill" isnt about keeping a river abundant with trout, it's more like a trick to convince CnR anglers that they are separated from the put-and-take mindset.
Quote:
|
Re: Updated Trout Stocked Waters
Quote:
Take back your No Kill zones.....stop jammin me..... |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.