Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

Now that we got hosed by most of our neighbors at the ASMFC, what do we need to do?

First and foremost, take a broader look at why we are in this situation. The Magnuson-Stevens act is how we are regulated. This law, while perhaps well intended, is having terrible unintended consequences. The law needs to be repealed.

Please don't be foolish and believe the fisheries managers. The regulations for any fishery will never be relaxed with our current regulatory framework.

Look at seabass. The SSB is 130% of what it needs to be. The council just cut the recreational harvest by another 8%, while increasing commercial harvest by 50%+.

The porgy SSB is 200%+ of what it needs to be. The council just cut the bag limit from 50 to 15 fish. When asked why, the response was "because 50 fish is too much". Now, I would rather have a root canal than clean hundreds of porgies, but having the government dictate what is too much is a very slippery slope.

The entire regulatory framework needs to be completely revamped. The people who have been and are fighting this is the RFA.
If you are outraged at the entire fisheries management process I urge you to join with them in repealing the MSA.

Re: So now what
 

15 porgy this year? There's a billion of those out there.

Re: So now what
 

Exactly Tom!! Magnuson needs to have some flexibility and Fisheries Management needs to be sobered up and totally revamped.

Support the RFA for fighting the political side and the SSFFF which is trying to get better science introduced.

www.joinRFA.org
www.ssfff.org/id65.html

Re: So now what
 

I say we all become outlaws.

Re: So now what
 

I've been eating 16 inch fluke sashimi for years now. As they say in that old commercial "just do it".

Re: So now what
 

How much is the fine if you are in possession of short fish? Cant be that much can it?

Re: So now what
 

I think it might be $200.00

Re: So now what
 

It is not over yet guys so lets not go nuclear here. There are still many wheels turning in this process before the final decision will be made.
If you have not contacted your representatives yet please do so, and please stay informed.

Re: So now what
 

Rather then the nuclear option we could have a Sunctuary option. If the Fed says we can only keep 3 @19 and our state wants status quo which is 5 @ 18.... The Govenor can choose not to enforce 3 @ 19 within the 3 mile line of our state and enforce 5 @ 18 instead....

Re: So now what
 

Go to the NOAA site and read about Black Sea Bass. Stocks rebuilt, not over fished. So they cut our winter offshore sea bass fishing and lowered the limits, I'm so over saltwater fishing.

Re: So now what
 

This decision will certainly drive more people to simply ignore the regulations. If you think about it it's a fair thing to do. Maine and time again, these regulators simply ignore recreational input.
At a minimum, I would strongly encourage everybody who comes in contact with a survey intercept person to verbally abuse them and their entire family. Those surveys simply do not help us in any way.

Re: So now what
 

If it comes down to that I have no problem with it for 2017.

It is the big picture we have to focus on also. The Magnuson-Stevens mess needs to be dealt with once and for all. Yes there are some good points in it, and yes there are some horrible points in it that we need to finally address.

Our law makers seem to be checking their brains at the door when they are making these decisions.

Re: So now what
 

NJ can also implement its own management plan to reduce the poundage of the harvest by the numbers the feds are looking for.
so going to a slot limit can do both.
allow us to keep 5 fish , and lower the total weight taken by taking smaller fish.

the best option still is a slot option to take some of the smaller male fish in the daily creel

Re: So now what
 

I was under the impression after last week that many of our politicians are on our side ? If the bay fishing and down the beach is good , then I would like for the governor to hold the status quo . But nobody knows what kind of season it will be . I think there are more people getting involved , this is good , keep up the pressure and get those slot fish .
It's good to have many knowledgeable people on this site , please keep us informed .

Re: So now what
 

Just googled it and got a few different answers but looks like one fish is 54 bucks. Thats nothing.....

Re: So now what
 

Sanctuary state was my post but you moved it to non-fishing!

Re: So now what
 

7:25-18.1(c)1 Take/possess 1 undersized marine fish $54
7:25-18.1(c)1.a Take/possess 1 marine fish over limit $54
7:25-18.1(c)1.f Possess 1 marine fish during closed season $54
7:25-18.1(c)2 Take/possess 2 undersized marine fish $84
7:25-18.1(c)2.b Take/possess 2 marine fish over limit $84
7:25-18.1(c)2.g Take/possess 2 marine fish during closed season $84
7:25-18.1(c)3 Take/possess 3 undersized marine fish $114
7:25-18.1(c)3.c Take/possess 3 marine fish over limit $114
7:25-18.1(c)3.h Take/possess 3 marine fish during closed season $114
7:25-18.1(c)4 Take/possess 4 undersized marine fish $144
7:25-18.1(c)4.d Take/possess 4 marine fish over limit $144
7:25-18.1(c)4.i Take/possess 4 marine fish during closed season $144
7:25-18.1(c)5 Take/possess 5 undersized marine fish $174
7:25-18.1(c)5.e Take/possess 5 marine fish over limit $174
7:25-18.1(c)5.j Take/possess 5 marine fish during closed season $174
7:25-18.1(d)1 Possess land or sell prohibited species of marine fish $54
7:25-18.1(d)2 Possess land or sell prohibited species of marine fish - two fish $84
7:25-18.1(d)3 Possess land or sell prohibited species of marine fish - three fish $114
7:25-18.1(d)4 Possess land or sell prohibited species of marine fish - four fish $144
7:25-18.1(d)5 Possess land or sell prohibited species of marine fish - five fish $174
09/01/04

Re: So now what
 

Can I have all your stuff? Especially the seeker and loomis offshore rods?

Re: So now what
 

Your kidding right?

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

We catch our 3 at 19. Clean the boat, the fish, and have a nice dinner.

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

Things appear to be happening in Washington by a few of our legislators.
Earlier today pallone and lobiondo introduced legislation to maintain status quo.
http://pallone.house.gov/press-relea...er-quotas-cuts
Now it is up to us to pressure our local representatives to move this bill forward. With all the shit going on in the world of politics, I'm happy they took the time to address our important issue.
Call or write your local rep to make sure they are moving this forward.
I will be forwarding the signed petition to Booker, schumer and MacDonald to make it clear this issue needs to progress.

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

According to John Toth, President of Jersey Coast Angler's Association, in the March 2017 JCAA Newspaper, he states, and I quote, "So, at this point, New Jersey has opted to go out of compliance with ASMFC's regulations! We will start our 2017 on May 21st to September 25th with an 18-inch minimum size and 5 fish limit."

He goes on to say " So we are in uncharted waters now! What's going to happen next? That's a good question. It will take some time for us to be ruled out of compliance and our state may introduce legal action to slow it down or stop it."

I don't know who has decided that NJ opted to go out of compliance, it's the first I've heard of it. I assume the announcement by Congressman Pallone that he plans, in the future, to introduce legislation is the legal action John writes about. I heard Congressman Pallone speak at the DEP Press Conference last month and he seemed sincere, let's keep up the fight and support those who are fighting for us.

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

NJ Senator and Congressional Update
http://chrissmith.house.gov/news/doc...umentID=400179

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

Great news that Wilbur Ross has been confirmed at Commerce. This is exactly what we were hoping for.
I'm impressed our government representatives took the initiative to send this letter as quickly as they did. I believe they hear our plea loud and clear on th issue.

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

Looks like our new Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross got all the memos and is taking interest in our Fisheries.

You'll see in his first address below, right at 10:12 he mentions that one of his goals is to "attain maximum sustainable yields for our fisheries".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJJg...youtu.be&t=581

Times the are a changing

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

Bad link Boss.

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

I'll still fish for them. Dennis

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

Re: So now what
 

[At a minimum, I would strongly encourage everybody who comes in contact with a survey intercept person to verbally abuse them and their entire family. .[/QUOTE]


IMHO-Comments like this should not be tolerated by moderators.

Re: So now what
 

IMHO-Comments like this should not be tolerated by moderators.[/QUOTE]

I more than welcomed them when came to check our catch after a charter. They are just doing there job.

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

I understand your viewpoint, but a LOT of guys are restricted to the rivers, bay, or close to the beach, and 3 at 19 is going to be very tough.. even 18 in. the bay is not that easy, after the first few weeks.. the guys with bigger boats, that can range further offshore will do ok, but the close in guys are going to have a lot of skunks... bob

Re: So now what
 

I more than welcomed them when came to check our catch after a charter. They are just doing there job.[/QUOTE]


I respect both opinions above but I have a different view.. it seems obvious that Gerry doesn't have a major problem with this somewhat bitter outlook, and let the poster voice his displeasure, and let it stand.

My take is this.. Yes, they are "just doing their job".. however over the entire course of human history, people in all walks of life have justified all manner of horrible behaviors in the name of " I was only doing my job".. just because its "your job", does NOT make it right... bob

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

That quote was not posted by researchdude or captain sal
Let's be careful who we accuse...

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

Yes, go back to post #11 for the originator...

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

i am glad that i live in southern nova scotia where the dept of fisheries let us catch 10 flounder fish any size, i let the small ones go back as our waters are very full of flounder and the population is getting bigger every year. we can catch our 10 limit in about an hour and some of them are 4 to 5 lb. we have lots of halibut in the bay also but we are not allowed to keep them. the water temp has dropped a bit in the last few days keeping the flounder off the coast, have to wait till it warms up a bit. happy fishing

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

Did any one get an e-mail from the NJFW to complete a survey questionaire on line ?? i did the other day.
On February 2, 2017, the Summer Flounder, Scup and Black Sea Bass Management Board, part of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC), approved changes to this coming year's summer flounder quota for New Jersey. It mandated a one-inch size increase to New Jersey's current recreational summer flounder minimum size limit (raising it from 18-inches to 19-inches) and decreased the possession limit from 5 fish to 3 fish. New Jersey is appealing this change.

In reaching its decision the Board did not determine or consider the potential economic impact of the new quota on the summer flounder industry in New Jersey. This survey is designed to help estimate the extent of the economic impact of these recently approved summer flounder management regulations on recreational fishing. Your responses about recent trends in harvest size, abundance, and throwback mortality will help inform future decisions that promote conservation while minimizing adverse economic impacts.

We strongly urge you to complete the survey as thoroughly and accurately as possible within the next 5 days. The survey should only take about 15 minutes to complete. Your participation in this survey is voluntary and your identity throughout remains anonymous. Nowhere is your name or email requested or captured. Your cooperation, however, is much-needed to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the results. Please know that your answers will be kept confidential.

The link to the survey is:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/FNP5L3C

Thank you,

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

In addition there was also a line item to voice your opinion, which I also did.
I assume they sent you the survey if you registered for the saltwater angler permit. Maybe not such a bad thing ??

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

I filled mine out and was very truthful, I will not fish as much if I can't put something on the table every now and then.:mad:

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

If I were a betting man I think that is the way most feel and the survey will prove that out.

Re: Fluke Regulations - So now what
 

Same here had me thinking hard, yes, I was very truthfull.
I view this as hopefully one of positive result from the saltwater
Registry, even if you don't fish party boat etc and target fluke from the sand, you have an opinion and can see what's going on with the species from a different perspective, so, I hope you complete the survey, here is an opportunity to voice your opinion on a different platform other than here.