![]() |
Re: Fishery Management
A slot @15-18 would be perfect. That's what I wrote in to the comments section of the striper survey sent out earlier in the season. Thanks for all your efforts.
|
Re: Fishery Management
Quote:
|
Re: Fishery Management
Quote:
|
Re: Fishery Management
Quote:
|
Re: Fishery Management
Quote:
|
Re: Fishery Management
I don't buy the whole climate change, migration stuff one bit. Like it was said, then we would be sitting on the bio-mass from North Carolina.
|
Re: Fishery Management
[QUOTE=dales529;534640]LOL please re read your words and get back to us on where you went wrong! Its pretty plain to see. I suspect you are picking on a person that subscribes to your thinking on fighting for rights but then say they are "bitching". :confused:[/Q
"To my thinking"? Really? Like i'm beneath you. Where I went wrong is when I tried to converse with someone like you who I thought would be the person to inform us on what's happening . Don't think the fighting you do for the fishery goes un-noticed, but get over yourself. Don't worry, I will no longer post any comments or anything else including fishing reports especially now that I know "my thinking" isn't acceptable. Good luck. Gerry, please feel free to remove me from posting if deemed necessary. |
Re: Fishery Management
great just great,we are now fighting each other.as i have said and will always say"thank you to all who are doing what they can" to help this fishery.we have facts,graphs and all that goes with it but we still have no answers or change.if i may use a little common sense{and i don't have much} why are they making us take bigger fish when most of the bigger fish are females????last i checked these
fish need male and female to make little fluke.i for one am done with jersey fluking and spend my time fishing in new england and spending my money there as well.i have waited long enough to know that our elected officials don't care enough about us or what we try to do,it is a shame.how come other states don't have these problems???? |
Re: Fishery Management
[QUOTE=OH HENRY II;534647][QUOTE=dales529;534640]LOL please re read your words and get back to us on where you went wrong! Its pretty plain to see. I suspect you are picking on a person that subscribes to your thinking on fighting for rights but then say they are "bitching". :confused:[/Q
"To my thinking"? Really? Like i'm beneath you. Where I went wrong is when I tried to converse with someone like you who I thought would be the person to inform us on what's happening . Don't think the fighting you do for the fishery goes un-noticed, but get over yourself. Don't worry, I will no longer post any comments or anything else including fishing reports especially now that I know "my thinking" isn't acceptable. Good luck. Gerry, please feel free to remove me from posting if deemed necessary.[/ Your post does not make sense.So he disagrees with you and you get all huffy. Grow up. |
Re: Fishery Management
[QUOTE=OH HENRY II;534647]
Quote:
My post was regarding your comment that Dakota is the ONE "Bitching". That man has spent countless hours generating documents, charts, analysis etc to help get us out of this poor federal management so just thought you may want to re think that statement. IF i misunderstood your post my apologies. I would never think you or anyone else that posts on here is beneath me as I dont know you or many others and the ones i do know have become life long friends.Also you never tried to converse with ME you just made a post on Dakotas comments which I felt the need to address. I dont need to get over myself as i dont think I do that much but have taken the time to be involved for many years and hope it helps. Believe me there are many that do more. Hope that ends any personal issues and by all means keep posting. The fight is not among us |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.