![]() |
Re: RFA Update on Sanctuary Proposal
Quote:
Guess why - its because there are none. |
Re: RFA Update on Sanctuary Proposal
Quote:
|
Re: RFA Update on Sanctuary Proposal
Quote:
Of course none of the "fishing" organizations will admit to letting stock go extinct but that is what has happened in the last 20 years. Remember Leroy's? "We Smoke Anything". That used to be whiting that were available by the sack full for years. But under the watch of our wonderful regulators, they are gone and so is Leroy's. So dont cry about fish houses going out of business if we try to do something about draggers. It is already happening and local restaurants are having to serve pollack and cod and haddock imported from distant waters. |
Re: RFA Update on Sanctuary Proposal
Way too much to talk about here so hopefully I'll catch up with you some day to continue our discussion...I am on my way to Neptune to get a fried WHITING sandwich at Jody's. :rolleyes:
|
Re: RFA Update on Sanctuary Proposal
Getting back to the original question. I say support the RFA they seem to be the strongest voice we have fighting for us in this and all matters involving our rights to fish. I would guess many if not most of us already belong to the RFA but if your not we need all the support we can get. I know money can be tight but it does take money to fight for our rights. I believe supporting the RFA is money well spent. Now about the sanctuary look what happened in other sanctuaries. We don't want that and the RFA is against it. About the draggers the reason they get to take what they do is because they spend the money to lobby the govt. to get what they want. As I have said before I am not against all commercial fishing but certain gear is too efficient at making money by taking and killing all fish from the sea including by-catch and shorts. The regulations need to be changed. And it not just us as fisherman who suffer. The boat builders and dealers the tackle makers and dealers, bait and tackle shops, gas docks, marinas, the list goes on all have a stake in this. And we should all stick together. Support the RFA and other similar groups it's in our own best interest...Charlie
|
Re: RFA Update on Sanctuary Proposal
Quote:
|
Re: RFA Update on Sanctuary Proposal
NoLimit
your post "The original thread was about restoring the winter flounder, fluke, sea trout, and crab that used to spawn every year in the Sanctuary and they are now gone." What Sanctuary? Not to mention that the original post was about the efforts of RFA to stop the proposed Sanctuary for this area. Its really OK you can just say you are FOR the sanctuary as that's obvious and yes you may possibly maybe get draggers off the area depending on the lobbying if the sanctuary were to go through but rest assured YOU (recreational) will be out of said sanctuary way before them and under regulations elsewhere you cant even begin to imagine to years to come. |
Re: RFA Update on Sanctuary Proposal
Quote:
The subject is the disappearance of fluke, flounder, weaks, and crab from the bays and rivers. So far neither you or anyone else has provided an action plan to bring them back (along with whiting and ling) from extinction. I want to know who will organize this effort. We did it with stripers and clams - now its time to finish the job. PS - If you are not going to lead or follow, get out of the way. |
Re: RFA Update on Sanctuary Proposal
Quote:
|
Re: RFA Update on Sanctuary Proposal
Capt'n Sal, I have read your posts and I've got no quarrel with you because you have seen all the ups and downs like me.
However before money is to be raised, the problem has to be identified and the problem here is decimation of stocks by draggers which happens after the fish leave the bays and rivers. I am doing all I can to raise awareness with those that do not realize the problem. You cant raise money to fix a problem if people do not realize that it is a problem. We had people that were supposedly committed to restoring the bay and rivers and I presumed that included the former underwater marine residents but it fell on deaf ears. What they dont see doesnt bother them I guess - they seem to think the problem is inert plastic bags and kids having fun on jet skis. Similarly, I said the same thing here to fishermen who should know better and what I heard was "Send more money" and "I wanna eat baby whiting that was crushed in a net for an hour and then cooked in a restaurant 4 months later". I dont know about anyone else, but I go fishing to catch fresh fish and crab for the table and except for a couple months a year, pickings are slim. Livery marinas and party boats are hurting and I am not sure why people are seeing the obvious solution. The economic impact to shore businesses is huge compared to the few tons of fish that are getting dragged. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.