Re: 2014 Fluke Regulations
Quote:
|
Re: 2014 Fluke Regulations
Quote:
|
Re: 2014 Fluke Regulations
Quote:
Hey Marc!...scratch.....scratch, scratch.....bump.....thump,thump,THUMP....Swiiiiii iiing! Darnit? |
Re: 2014 Fluke Regulations
Quote:
|
Re: 2014 Fluke Regulations
Quote:
Also, what party boat do you fish on? |
Re: 2014 Fluke Regulations
Is the fishing really this bad!!!!!!
|
Re: 2014 Fluke Regulations
Quote:
|
Re: 2014 Fluke Regulations
Asbury Park Press article
Regional fluke measures approved Feb 6, 2014 | By John Oswald | @oswaldapp ... Despite overwhelming opposition, regional management measures for summer flounder for the 2014 season have been approved by the ASMFC. The approved summer flounder regions are Massachusetts and Rhode Island; Connecticut ... Sorry, could not get the link to paste. A good read on who did and said what, Some key points as follows: * However, the Addendum was perceived, mainly by New Jersey anglers, as a thinly disguised fish grab by the state of New York. * October, Capt. Anthony DiLernia, a voting member of the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council from New York, said that if the MAFMC elected to stay with coastal equivalency at it’s December meeting, New York was ready to take that decision to court.The tactic worked. “The final decision was incredible,” said Chris Zeman, one of New Jersey’s representatives to the MAFMC. “I’m shocked that they are going through with this one-year experiment. They are playing with people’s livihoods here *“New York was threatening litigation to get this through and NOAA clearly listened to New York,” said Zeman. It’s totally appeasement. And in the history of western civilization, has appeasement ever worked? “New York pushed hard and had the backing of NOAA, which carried a lot of weight,” What Nowalsky found most troubling was the decision’s impact on state’s rights. “Individual states have lost their autonomy to go ahead and select regulations that are most beneficial to that state’s anglers, and that loss of autonomy is extremely disconcerting,” he said. It’s especially tough, he added, considering all these states have done to constrain harvests and manage the resource. ************************* ............One thing I find most interesting is the comment about NOAA and their support towards NY. As a federal agency is that appropriate? And especially Nowalsky’s comment about states rights. Could that be a Constitutional violation of state sovereignty? |
Re: 2014 Fluke Regulations
Quote:
|
Re: 2014 Fluke Regulations
Maybe instead of 4 fluke at 18 inches we could get 2 fish at 17 1/2. That would give more people an opportunity to take some fillets home.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.